You, too, can get one-click updates and links to our live interviews, daily news polls, and much more at www.twitter.com/ABC_NewsRadio

If you already have a Twitter account, then simply follow ABC_NewsRadio – that’s ABC (underscore) NewsRadio.

We’ll also be alerting you to breaking news right across the week with regular ‘tweets’.

That’s ABC NewsRadio: your news, now.

A very hot & heavy week in Denmark, but to what end ?
Too much heat and not enough action from world leaders.
Or to put it another way: so this is Christmas and what have we done ?
So…some music news to end the week:

Swedish pop icons ABBA will be inducted into the US Rock and Roll Hall of Fame next year, along with punk rockers the Stooges, art-rockers Genesis, reggae’s Jimmy Cliff and beat band The Hollies.

“ABBA first put Sweden on rock’s global map,” the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame announced, with the four Swedes poised to join the likes of heavy metal group Black Sabbath, punk pioneers the Sex Pistols, and jazz trumpeter Miles Davis in rock music’s pantheon.

The five groups will be officially inducted into the rock and roll shrine at a ceremony in New York on March 15 next year.

After this ceremony, films recounting the five groups’ careers and a display of artefacts will be on display at the Hall of Fame Museum, while just about every song written by each of the bands will feature on a computerized jukebox.

That will mean that music fans could segue from the Stooges’ “I Wanna Be Your Dog” to Genesis’s “One-eyed Hound” and on to ABBA’s “Waterloo”, before selecting “Many Rivers to Cross” by Jimmy Cliff or The Hollies’ “The Air that I Breathe.”

In light of this, it’s intriguing to recall that legendary British rock band Led Zeppelin were branded “old fashioned” and “unconvincing” by BBC producers, when they auditioned in 1969, according to archives released by the broadcaster Thursday.

David Bowie and Marc Bolan’s T-Rex were also criticised when they first tried to get their music on the BBC, a report added.

Led Zeppelin, fronted by singer Robert Plant, went on to sell more than 300 million albums worldwide and are viewed as one of most important groups in rock history with their mix of blues, folk and rock guitar.

They were invited to appear before a BBC audition panel in 1969, one year after they were signed, but faced a highly critical response.

One producer said they were “not for daytime radio — specialist listening only”, another described them as “derivative” and “unconvincing”, while a third said the group had “an old-fashioned sound”.

Led Zeppelin, comprising Plant, guitarist Jimmy Page, bassist John Paul Jones and drummer John Bonham, went on to play several sessions for BBC radio.

The band, who had a string of hits in the 1970s including “Stairway to Heaven”, split up in 1980 following the death of Bonham, who famously choked on his own vomit following a drinking binge.

Bowie, meanwhile, was dismissed as “a singer devoid of personality” when he tried to get his songs on the BBC in 1965, and Bolan’s T-Rex was labelled “crap and pretentious crap at that,” according to the Times.

An early version of the Rolling Stones was also rejected by a BBC panel.

___

Mark - Breakfast E.P.

Well, this is my last offering for a while, as I’ve got a few weeks off.

So I thought I would write something profound.

Despite the fact my kids have got all sorts of orders in with Santa for expensive toys and the latest gizmos, they’ll probably have more fun over the Christmas hols making cubby houses out of the lounge cushions, or making creations with bits of cardboard, sticky tape and a pair of scissors.

They’ve asked me to save old toilet rolls and empty tissue boxes.

And I got in big trouble recently when they caught me putting an old ice cream container out in the recycling.

So this morning I give you my festive season craft tip.

A perfect way to recycle a pannetone box:

recyclers-r-us

Sort of “Where the Wild Things Are” meets Ned Kelly.

Hours of endless fun.

Have a great Christmas and a Happy New Year!

(Editor’s Note: Mark needs this spell….!!….and seriously, deserves it.)

Here at NewsRadio, we’re all monitoring a range of media throughout the Brekkie show, and one of the TV programs we keep an eye on during the course of the morning is ABC2 Breakfast.

I often catch snippets of sport with Paul Kennedy on that show (as well the sport bulletins and interviews on BBC-TV, CNN, Channels 7 and 9 and FoxSports.)

Dipping in and out means I don’t get to see everything all the way through and so I don’t know if the debate about netball versus basketball that was set up by Virginia Trioli yesterday, during the sports chat with Paul on ABC2, ever actually developed. But I’m weighing in anyway. If it didn’t happen, then consider this a pre-emptive strike!

After seeing some footage from the weekend of Australian basketball legend, Lauren Jackson, playing back in the Women’s National Basketball League after returning from overseas, Virginia made a comment to the effect of “we must discuss at some stage how much more difficult it is to score in netball than basketball.” She then made a reference to the rings being smaller, and she might’ve mentioned the absence of a backboard as well.

You might be relieved to know that even people who work in the media argue back with the TV or radio on occasion. And I had a few sharp words to say to Virginia in reply to that.

Yes, the netball ring is smaller than the basketball hoop (38cm compared to 45cm) and not being able to deflect a shot off the backboard means the netball goalshooters need to have perfect placement. But I would submit there are many other challenges that face a shooter in basketball than there are in netball.

For a start, the basketball is slightly bigger and harder than a netball ball, making the bounce more dramatic when it hits the hoop.

But more importantly, defenders can make physical contact with a shooter while they’re launching their shot in basketball, something certainly not allowed in netball, where defenders can stand nearly a metre away and wave their arms in front of a goalshooter but can’t actually make any contact whatsoever. Only two players on court at any one time are allowed to take a shot in netball, and they do so from a static position, having time to balance, take aim and put up their shot unhindered.

What’s more, the shooters in netball don’t have to cover full length of the court in between shots. The goalshooter never leaves the third of the court where her goal is, the wing attack is allowed to move across two thirds of the court.

In basketball, the court is 2.5 metres shorter and slightly narrower than in netball, but every player is required to move across all areas of it in defence and attack and every player needs to be able to shoot.

The only time a basketballer gets to shoot an uncontested shot is from the foul line. And the foul line is 3.96 metres from the front of the rim.

Basketball also tests shooting from a greater range. The shooting circle in basketball is 6.25m in radius. In netball, it’s 4.9m. In basketball, you can shoot from outside that area as well and be rewarded with three points for the extra distance, so a good all-round shooter in basketball needs to be able to put the ball in from much further out than the specialist shooters in netball.

So, yes Virginia, there is a difference in the size of ring and the degree of accuracy needed when shooting in netball. But nobody in basketball gets the luxury of being a specialist shooter and standing at one end of the court waiting for the ball to be delivered to them. Everyone in basketball has to shoot, they have to be able to do it while someone is banging into their body, they have to be able to do it from further out and they have to run the full length of the court in between most shots.

I don’t think a seven centimetres bigger hoop size and a backboard makes shooting a doddle for the women in basketball, who incidentally at international level have to be able to go head to head with super powers like USA, China and Russia, not normally just beat New Zealand for a world title.

Your shot, Virginia

___

Glen - Presenter …

‘He’s a celebrity - get me out of here’

Scandal-hit golfer Tiger Woods’ wife has bought a vast beachfront estate on an island near Stockholm that can only be reached by boat .

Woods is taking a hiatus from professional golf after admitting he had cheated on his wife, amid reports that 11 women had claimed to have had relationships with him.

Am I the only one starting to get a bit suspicious about the increasingly long line of women (lots of porn stars, in particular) who claim to be among the Tiger conquests?

None of them would be keen on boosting their profile or furthering their career in the sex biz, would they ?

The lesson of it all is to not become the content provider for an increasingly voracious media that ’s never been more hungry for material; the appetite for stories is so immense these days that a story like this that just keeps giving is manna from heaven.

And the media space has never been larger, and harder to fill. It needs feeding constantly and will gladly eat you up and spit you out. God forbid you prove to be worthy of more than one course.

Certainly, the online community have been grateful for the increased traffic the Tiger story has created . I think it was a Yahoo executive who said it was as good for business as Michael Jackson’s death.

Even better, she added, “It’s hard to sell ads next a funeral.” Nice.

So the moral : Sex is better than death.

Just don’t get caught.

You only get one chance to make a first impression.

And Tony Abbott is not exactly an unknown commodity for Australian voters.

But taking on the leadership is a point of renewal in any career and the “new” Tony Abbott is selling himself hard to the electorate.

And while he is trying to make a good impression, the Government is doing its level best to encourage doubts in the public mind over the Opposition leader.

The key words being chanted, from the Prime Minister, down are: “extremist…. erratic….policy on the run….loose talk….”

This Government mantra will continue through the next year as the never-ending election campaign intensifies as the election itself draws nearer - August is the best guess.

On the other side, the Greek Chorus of the Coalition will chant: “…..the Government’s big tax….”

This exchange cascades on through a litany of claim and misrepresentation:

“You want to reintroduce Workchoices!!”

“You’re just big tax and big spend!!”

So we must look through that blizzard of slogans to see what is going on.

The truth is in there, somewhere; it accumulates through a study of what people say over time about an issue like - in this case, climate change.

Ask any politician publicly about the issue and all of them - every man and woman, from Cory Bernardi to Bob Brown - will profess they believe climate change is real and something should be done about it.

So there’s no point in asking that question. Motherhood is the answer.

Dig down and you’ll see revealing patterns.

That’s why the Four Corners program which triggered the Liberal leadership rockslide was so powerful. It showed Nick Minchin and others expressing their misgivings about climate change. Nothing that new in what they said - and nothing that definite.

Nick Minchin’s hardest line was to say a majority of Liberals shared his view that the case of human action being the main driver of climate change had not been proven.

But when his views were lined up with other doubters and presented on your TV on a Monday evening, the impact was much more than the sum of its parts.

The reality of both Government and Opposition is hard to define…

And harder still in the increasing pace of spin in the months (eight?) between now and when you participate in the only poll that matters.

Surveys show that close to 80% of people now feel they don’t know enough about the Emissions Trading Scheme to make an informed decision about it.

This figure suggests that something like 20% of respondents are kidding themselves.

Climate change has been described by many as the hardest issue the political world has ever faced.

And it is the hardest on many levels.

Put aside those who think there is no problem with the planet warming and those who think no action can be enough or come soon enough.

Stay in the land of possible action and it still looks beyond hard.

The politics of trying to get nearly 200 sovereign States to gather in a Scandinavian conference hall and agree on anything is a task that beggars belief.

The preamble to any discussion in that room is an understanding of the science, a calculation of national self interest and an estimation of the competing lobby groups - the CO2 generators, the consumers who want power and want also to leave a planet that does not look like a charred chip.

So what do people do when faced with this universe of information that is beyond understanding?

They abandon reason in favour of emotion.

There is an instinctive reaction of some people to dislike “green” arguments and to be on the side of development. Nick Minchin spoke to that group when he told Four Corners the majority of Liberals did not believe in man-made climate change and that the climate change cause was energised by a leftist desire to de-industrialise the west.

On the other side, many people have an emotional attachment to green causes. A general sense is that the planet is being trashed and that it will be pretty much extinguished if a global population of 6.8 billion attempts to reach a first world level of material well being via the high-carbon path of industrial history.

In between those views is one most prominently - and to some most surprisingly - expressed by Rupert Murdoch, when he said whatever the details, on the evidence, the planet deserves the benefit of the doubt.

You can see how people arrive at positions like the above.

But that doesn’t really involve an understanding of the talmudic complexities of an ETS.

It doesn’t equip you to answer questions like:
What should the price per tonne of carbon pollution be?
What about the off-sets?
How about the CMD’s?
How do you monitor a world-wide trade in carbon credits?
Has ‘cap and trade’ worked in the EU?

Something like 20,000 people are now debating these and other issues for two weeks and they will produce an outcome. Good luck understanding it.

The only certainty is that whatever agreement is produced in Copenhagen, the world will agree to disagree.

___

Debbie - sport

Who would’ve thought I’d need a footnote* to yesterday’s piece about goalkeepers scoring in soccer so quickly?

As mentioned yesterday, after the Bayern Munich goalkeeper had scored from the penalty spot in his team’s European Champions League win over Juventus, the other situation where goalkeepers score occasionally is when it’s desperation time late in a game.

Well, that happened this morning in Belgium in another Champions League game when the home team Standard Liege were trailing 1-nil against AZ Alkmaar of the Netherlands.

They sent their goalkeeper, Sinan Bolat forward and he headed in for an equaliser FIVE minutes into added on time.

As it turned out, it wasn’t enough to get Liege into the last 16 of the Champions League, but it did earn them a place in the second tier competition, The Europa League (formerly the UEFA Cup).

Surely it would be a first to have two goalies scoring in the same round of the Champions League?

Also yesterday, I linked to footage of the legendary Colombian keeper, Rene Higuita’s outrageous “scorpion kick” save.

Here’s some more footage of him scoring from the penalty spot for Atletico Nacional against River Plate.

(Well worth checking out for the commentary alone!)
* is “footnotes” quite the right term when writing about goalkeepers? Or should it be “handnotes”, or “glovenotes”?

Tony Abbott gives good copy.

What’s more, the former journo and press secretary knows it, too.

He was clearly enjoying himself on Lateline last night:

TONY JONES: You’ve got four or five former Howard Ministers in that Cabinet?

TONY ABBOTT: And why not make the most of the experience and the energy that those people have? What I wanted was a frontbench …

TONY JONES: Well, before you answer that, let me just throw something back at you. Paul Keating once called you a “young fogey”. I mean, you’ve done your reshuffle now, but are you at all worried that you’re gonna be regarded as a young fogey leading a bunch of old fogeys?

TONY ABBOTT: Well, if we win the election, I’ll be regarded as a genius. If we don’t win, I’ll probably be political roadkill at some point in time.

Indeed.

In a wide-ranging and often amusing interview, the two Tonys ranged over a number of topics - leadership, climate change and the Copenhagen Conference and why Kevin Rudd allegedly won’t appear on Lateline.

And there was this:

TONY JONES: Let’s go back a couple of steps. How much of an inspiration was John Howard in your decision to challenge for the Liberal leadership?

Tony Abbott was adamant it was his decision alone to go for the top job.

But the Opposition leader got more curiously more circumspect as the Tony Jones warmed to the topic:

TONY JONES: Did you tell him (John Howard) of your plan to dump the Emissions Trading Policy that he took to the last election?

TONY ABBOTT: Look, I think, Tony, that there are all sorts of conversations with all sorts of people. The important thing is …

TONY JONES: But that would be the most intriguing one, wouldn’t it, because you’ve relied on him to some degree as a political mentor?

TONY ABBOTT: Yes.

TONY JONES: You talked about being a weathervane, seeing the changes in politics; wouldn’t you go to your old mentor to sort of seek his advice on something as fundamental as this?

TONY ABBOTT: Well, I continue to have discussions with the former Prime Minister, and I think that anyone on our side of politics who wants to grow in wisdom does well to have discussions with him. But I didn’t want anyone else’s fingerprints, knowing that you would ask these sorts of questions and others like you would ask these sorts of questions, Tony, I didn’t want anyone to say that John Howard was still running the Liberal Party. And I didn’t want anyone to say that notwithstanding the very close relationship that I’ve had with John over the years that I am not my own man.

TONY JONES: Did he give you any advice at all on whether it was a good idea to drop the Emissions Trading Scheme that he took to the last election?

TONY ABBOTT: Well, you should ask him what he thinks about these things.

TONY JONES: But you’ve been quite happy to say no about other things and be vague about this one?

TONY ABBOTT: But his general view, Tony, and I don’t think I’m putting words into his mouth, is that he did what he thought was best in his time and it’s now up to us to do what we think best in our time.

TONY JONES: So he might, for example, believe the Emissions Trading Scheme is not a good thing politically for this time and have advised you such?

TONY ABBOTT: Well, I’m just not gonna go into what he might think about how the contemporary Liberal Party is handling things because he’s made it very clear that he isn’t gonna be a commentator on these events.

Well, a commentator in public, at least.

I just repeat what I said last week in this blog:

“Nothing of any consequence in the Liberal Party will happen without someone placing a call to John Howard…whether they be a “wet”, a “dry”, a “moderate” or a “conservative”.

He’s no “observer”.”

___

Debbie - Sport …

The Bayern Munich goalkeeper, Hans-Jorg Butt, will get plenty of headlines in sports sections around the world over the next day or two for doing something very unusual this morning.

He took, and converted, a penalty for his team in their 4-1 European Champions League win over Juventus in Turin.

It’s rare, although not unheard of for goalkeepers to score. Sometimes very late in a game when a team desperately needs to score the keeper will come up and get into the mix when his team is taking a corner. And sometimes it happens, as it did this morning, when the keeper is given the chance to take a penalty.

Recently, when we had Mark Bosnich as a guest on “Weekend Half Time”, I noticed that on his CV is a goal for the Socceroos. I checked it out and found it was a penalty that came in one of those goal-avalanche Oceania qualifiers against the Solomon Islands. His was one of 13 goals for the Australian team.

My local coffee shop in Sydney is frequented by a gaggle of soccer fans and I thought I’d test them out on that bit of Socceroo trivia. In return, my barista, Tony, told me about the former Colombian keeper, Rene Higuita, who was a regular spot-kick taker in internationals. Higuita, he said, was not only excellent with a penalty, but was also wont, on occasion, to dribble the ball upfield, taking on the defence.

But neither of those party tricks are what Higuita is most famous for. Tony directed me to go home and search on the internet for “Higuita scorpion kick”.

Maybe you’ve seen it before - but I hadn’t and, with due respect to Mr Butt’s efforts this morning, this is  truly is the most freakish act by a goalkeeper I’ve ever seen!

Well, It’s the biggest police mobilisation ever in Norway to ensure the safety of a single person.

AFP reports more than 2000 police, including snipers and sniffer dog handlers, will be mobilised for the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony in Oslo on Thursday honouring US President Barack Obama.

Part of the Norwegian capital’s normally-peaceful centre will be completely blocked off during the American leader’s visit. Snipers will be placed on roofs and manhole covers have already been sealed.

Between 2000 and 2500 police officers will be mobilised, most of whom will for the rare occasion carry weapons.

The Norwegian Government has earmarked 92 million kroner (10.9 million euros, $16 million) to cover security needs during Obama’s visit — more than 10 times the prize money awarded to the Peace Prize laureate.

Maybe Obama could give his prize money to the Secret Service, as it seems there’s a bit of work to do on Presidential security at home.

The Washington Post has published a 2003 Secret Service report that reveals the uninvited couple that recently sneaked into an exclusive State dinner at the White House join a lengthy list of similar security lapses.

The Secret Service — the branch in charge of the president’s security — have mistakenly seen at least 91 breaches of their checkpoints since 1980. (Hey, that’s only about 5 a year - what could possibly go wrong ??)

“This document reflects a proactive attempt to evaluate our security and obviously raises the awareness of uniformed division officers and agents about their jobs,” Secret Service spokesman Edwin Donovan said, according to the Post.

“We have to be concerned about the threats to our protectees at all times, whether at the White House or away from the White House.”

In one of the more bizarre lapses at the President’s heavily guarded mansion in Washington, an October 1982 breach known as “The Family Outing” saw a family of four in a minivan pull through the White House gates, after honking their horn at agents. ( “Coming through !”)

They were stopped as they approached the West Wing entrance.

In a more serious example, the report highlights a 1994 incident where a man fired 29 semi-automatic rifle rounds at the White House from outside the perimeter fence before he was confronted. (Just exercising his democratic right to bear arms, I guess)

Secret Service director Mark Sullivan accepted responsibility for the gate-crashed State dinner fiasco at a Congressional hearing last week.

Socialites Tareq and Michaele Salahi got past several checkpoints and into the White House, where they shook hands with Obama and mingled with top-level officials at the November 24 dinner honouring visiting Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Sullivan insisted security procedures were followed “without incident” for the other 1.2 million visitors to the White House in 2009, but acknowledged his service needed a “100 percent” security standard.

Apparently the 2003 report was used to train agents.

I think there might be a little more training required.

Maybe a field trip to Norway ?

___

Marius - Politics

One of the more interesting perspectives on our age of celebrity is that of the TV make-up artist.

These are the women (are there any men?) who powder and puff and pack faces, to allow them to look less flawed in the unpitying glare of studio lights.

They are there before the appearance, to dust away the human imperfections.

And they are there at the end with a hot towel.

For the stars, make-up is an elaborate procedure; for people in the news, it is a more cursory dust-over.

And for politicians, it is an enforced moment of stillness in their whirling-dervish lives.

They have to sit, and they can’t do much as they endure a moment of mild physical intimacy - and their response is instructive.

Recently, I asked for some assessments of the great and powerful from these women who see them more closely than almost anyone.

Here are some assessments from those who wield the powder brush.

John Howard…..”Used to be quite chatty, but became quieter and grumpier the longer he was in power.”

Julia Gillard….”She’s really nice.”

Bob Brown…”Very nice, too”

Malcolm Turnbull……”No communication…doesn’t know you’re there….no ‘please’ or ‘thank you.’”

Kevin Rudd…”He used to be quite chatty…always wanted to know what the punters were thinking…he’s pretty quiet now, but he might just be tired.”

A general pattern seemed to emerge that people became less considerate, less inclined to small talk and small courtesies, the greater their power and the longer in office.

But there are clearly exceptions to that rule.

It is unfair to judge anyone by this standard, but as the ABC’s correspondent in South Africa in the mid-1990s, I had the great good fortune to see Nelson Mandela as he campaigned to win that country’s first democratic election, and then as President.

Nelson Mandela was always a complete gentleman.

He would introduce himself to every person in a room, regardless of whether they were a national leader or a note taker. He would typically go out the back to meet kitchen staff or other support workers, giving them a handshake and a moment they would treasure for a lifetime.

Mandela was tough and shrewd and politically skilled, but always fantastically courteous.

He is a living reprimand to all of us when we are short with anyone.

And if you are dismissive of a make-up artist in particular - beware.

They are watching closely.

Headlines about a “horror” draw for the Socceroos at next year’s World Cup in South Africa amused me over the weekend.

Sure, we have to play Germany - but given we were always going to have a seeded team in our group, I’m not sure why this should be seen as some sort of cruel, unexpected obstacle in our path.

Last World Cup, we had Brazil in our group, a bit scarier a prospect than Germany, I think.

Serbia, also in our group, are currently ranked just one place ahead of us in the FIFA world rankings. And Ghana are 37 on the world standings, compared to the Socceroos 21.

A “horror” draw would’ve been to get one of the two unseeded heavyweights, France or Portugal, as well as the favourites Spain or the defending champions Italy. Or Brazil again.

But really, gasping at the prospect of having Germany, Serbia and Ghana to deal with first up at a World Cup is a bit like reaching the semi-finals at Wimbledon and being stunned to find you’ve got to face Andy Roddick or Novak Djokovic.

Or getting selected to open the batting for Australia and being amazed to find someone intends to bowl a cricket ball at you at more than 150k an hour.

It’s not a horror turn of events.

It’s what you’re in it for.

___

Mark - Breakfast E.P.

You’d think that after a week’s worth of information from all around the globe, I’d turn off my radio on the weekends…or at least listen to something other than ABC Newsradio.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Our weekend line up is truly terrific.

I usually try and catch Scott Wales and Debbie Spillane talking all things sporting on “Weekend Half Time”.

The radio repeat of “Insiders” is required listening at 11am ADST on Sundays (particularly if you sleep in and miss the version on the box!)

I also love dipping in and out during the day….getting the best of the BBC, Deutsche Welle, Radio Nederlands, plus all the news and sport from around Australia and the world.

And then occasionally I hear something that is so terrific that it takes your breath away.

Like yesterday’s “Assignment” program from the BBC World Service.

I’ve always been a fan of BBC correspondent Allan Little’s work, but his program on the legacy of Bhopal - the world’s worst industrial accident - is truly shocking.

It makes you want to scream at the radio about how unfair the world is for some people - particularly those who are poor, sick and marginalised, and are no match for multi-national companies with teams of suited lawyers who aren’t worried about morality, or governments that promise to help. And then don’t.

It should be required listening for anyone who works in the area of so-called “Corporate Social Responsibility”.

If you missed it, you can hear it on the web:

On another point:

In last Friday’s blog about NSW politics, I got a bit confused about the timeline of my Grandpa’s journalism career.

An email from my Mum (an avid reader!) soon straightened things out.

Apparently Alan Hill came back from the war, then went off to Tenterfield to edit and manage “The Star” for Rural Newspapers, before returning to Sydney as State Political Roundsman for the Daily Mirror, NOT the Telegraph as I had claimed.

He left Macquaire Street in the early ‘50s, when he came into some money from his father’s estate.

Grandpa bought the Harden-Murrumburrah Express and headed back to the country.

Not only was he the editor, chief reporter, publisher and owner of that esteemed publication on the NSW south-western slopes, he was also the Harden-Murrumburrah correspondent for 2LF - the radio station at Young.

You’ll be pleased to know the Express is still going strong.

It’s now owned by Fairfax:

http://www.hardenexpress.com.au/

And a final thought….

We went to a local Asian eatery last night to celebrate my son’s 12th birthday.

At the end of the meal, he opened his fortune cookie to reveal the profound message inside.

He rolled his eyes and groaned.

“What’s it say?” I said.

He handed it to me.

“The fortune you seek is in another cookie.”

NewsRadio’s Steve Chase walked the corridors of Macquarie Street for 13 years between 1988 and 2001 as ABC Radio News’ State Political reporter. He wrote a colourful book about his time there called “You Didn’t Get It From Me”.

Steve dogged three Premiers during his time: Nick Griener, John Fahey and Bob Carr.

NewsRadio Breakfast’s Marius Benson was based in the Daily Telegraph Bureau at the New South Wales State Parliament for several years from the mid 70’s - incidentally when one of his press gallery colleagues was an ambitious young mover-and-shaker called Malcolm Turnbull.

Eric Willis and Neville Wran were the Premiers then.

My grandpa, Alan Hill, was the Telegraph’s State Political roundsman in the years after the war.

He charted the careers of Labor’s Bill McKell and James McGirr before heading off to Tenterfield in the state’s north to edit the local paper, “The Star”.

All three of these seasoned journos saw plenty of political stoushes, backroom intrigues and scheming.

But nothing compares to the sheer political bastardry we’ve seen in the last few years in the NSW Labor Party….and probably best exemplified by the extraordinary events of yesterday.

Steve, Marius and Grandpa covered events at the “Bear Pit” for a combined total of more than 20 years.

They saw the rise and fall of seven Premiers.

In the last four years, there have been no less than four Labor Premiers in New South Wales, while the state has lurched from crisis to crisis.

Only one of those four Premiers has chosen the moment of his own departure.

That was Bob Carr, who quit ahead of what he apparently believed was an unwinnable 2007 state election.

A hapless Liberal opponent meant that Carr’s replacement, Morris Iemma, essentially won that poll by default.

Lauded by the ALP as its new saviour, Iemma was knifed by the party barely 18 months later over his first major reform — attempting to privatise the state electricity sector.

Such was the paucity of talent they saw around them, the factional bosses in the NSW Right who control the Parliamentary party chose someone from the Left — the relatively unknown Nathan Rees.

Then, less than 15 months later, angered that Mr. Rees had finally been given the power by the State ALP to put his own stamp on his administration by being able to pick his own Ministry, the warlords simply pulled the rug from underneath him.

Their answer?

Another relative unknown.

Kristina Keneally — the American-born Planning Minister probably best known to the public as the NSW Government spokeswoman for World Youth Day.

Recently, at Sydney’s Manly Beach, I spotted a mate of mine who worked in the Carr and Iemma Governments.

He was busy chasing his young son, so I didn’t yell out to him.

But I did notice that he no longer had the grey pall about him that he had when he worked for a Labor government preoccupied with internal fear and loathing, that is, in turn, widely loathed by the people of New South Wales.

Grandpa must be turning in his grave….

___

Marius - Politics

Most of us, when we walk into a crowded room, have our heads filled with thoughts like “hope I’m dressed right…is there a familiar face here…hope someone will talk to me..”

Leaders don’t think like that.

They walk into a room packed with people and think (a) I should be running this mob….and (b) who here is useful to me?

Malcolm Turnbull’s tendency to assume command was well demonstrated at his last couple of doorstops, when he confronted packs of microphone and camera-wielding journalists as he was on the slippery slope out of the Opposition leader’s office.

On both occasions, when lesser mortals would have been involved in trying to frame a coherent answer, Turnbull told journalists not only what to ask, but how to ask it then rehearsed them before insisting they then deliver their lines to his satisfaction.

Tony Abbott’s parents equally found in their son a quite startling willingness to take control. His father Dick Abbot has told The Australian that it was clear from an early age that Tony was destined for great things.

He recalls that when Tony was a young child: “A priest asked my wife: ‘What will Tony do with his life….She said: ‘Well , he’ll either be the Pope or Prime Minister.”

Leadership is an interesting quality. Like courage, it is morally neutral. Mandela was a natural leader and a man of courage, but so was Hitler.

Plato drew up a system of government which would see those who were best equipped, the philosopher-kings, put in the position of supreme power.

But that’s not how it works. Leadership belongs to those who want it enough.

Most of us are prepared to be Lance-Corporals of life. But there are those who have with them in the crib a Field Marshal’s baton.

Their fierce energies will drive them to the top so that one day they can stand in front of the world, enjoying the attention they have always wanted, needed.

They will say they are not there for their own ends, they are not interested in power and that they are now “humbled.”

They’re always humbled. The rest of us are periodically humiliated, only the genuinely powerful are “humbled.”

But you can’t blame them: they are slaves to a nature and/or early circumstance which has seen them destined from the first to achieve that one goal, to lead.

I hear whispers that the ABC may be screening The Colbert Report from the US Comedy Central cable channel next year. I hope so - ‘tis a great show.

In fact, the more I see of Comedy Central’s The Daily Show - where Stephen Colbert got his break - the more I understand why Jon Stewart’s long running program is the ‘news’ program of choice for many Americans - young & old. Its ‘fake news’ approach not only manages to highlight the lunacy of politics American-style and target the media’s often dubious frenzied tactics & practices, but also features a daily interview with influential people from all over the world. Recent editions have featured different members of the Obama cabinet, Vice President Joe Biden, Al Gore, and columnist Tom Friedman all calmly expounding on the challenges facing the US and the world. They were amusing, accessible exchanges that proved more educational than most so-called serious programs that often provide more heat than light. I’m always tempted to steal some of the interviews for replay on NewsRadio but sadly Comedy Central is not one of our partner networks.

By the way, I’ve noticed the key to Foxtel’s many new channels seems to be an increase in the repeating and rotation of many movies - if you miss something not only will it probably be coming up again soon, but may well be featured on another new channel in a few days. Not sure there is really that much new content there - just new delivery channels. I could certainly do without the lifestyle offerings like the ‘You’ channel cluttering up my program guide. To each his own, I suppose.

___

Mark - Breakfast E.P.

Glen read out a interesting bit of copy on air yesterday:

“Former Prime Minister John Howard has told ABC Online that he had spoken regularly with all three leadership contenders in the run-up to Tuesday’s Liberal leadership ballot.

Mr. Howard says that although he’s an “observer” and not a player, his goal “is to see the Liberal Party restored to government”.

“I’ve taken the approach that if anybody wants my advice, they can seek it and I’m happy to give it,” he said.

Mr. Howard says Tony Abbott is ‘articulate and energetic and I think he’ll make a very good fist of it’.”

Hang on…

Mr Howard spoke regularly to all three leadership contenders?

Okay, he and Tony Abbott pretty much sing from the same hymn-sheet.

After all Tony Abbott once described himself as “the ideological love child of John Howard and Bronwyn Bishop”.

Joe Hockey?

Well, John Howard’s always had a soft spot for the North Sydney MP, even though Big Joe’s an avowedly small “l” Liberal and John Howard a big “C” conservative.

But Malcolm Turnbull?

The man who once described John Howard as the Prime Minister “that broke Australia’s heart?”

You bet.

If anyone thought that after becoming only the second Prime Minister in this nation’s history to lose his seat at a general election that John Howard would do a Stanley Bruce and slink off to a quite life in the British House of Lords….think again.

The Liberal Party is John Winston Howard’s life.

Always has been, always will be.

Nothing of any consequence in the Liberal Party will happen without someone placing a call to John Howard…whether they be a “wet”, a “dry”, a “moderate” or a “conservative”.

He’s no “observer”.

You won’t hear John Howard publicly railing against alleged architectural crimes like Paul Keating, or promoting business links with China or advocating Australia take the world’s nuclear waste like the Silver Bodgie.

He’s got far more important things to do.